See what API testing solution came out on top in the GigaOm Radar Report. Get your free analyst report >>
![Logo for GIGAOM 365x70](https://www.parasoft.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/logo-gigaom-365x70-1.webp)
See what API testing solution came out on top in the GigaOm Radar Report. Get your free analyst report >>
Jump to Section
Learn about LLMs and their role in automation. Explore why it’s critical to have the flexibility to choose an LLM provider for software development and test automation solutions.
Jump to Section
Jump to Section
Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly transforming automation. They’re becoming essential tools to boost efficiency in software development and testing.
Whether assisting with code generation, automating test cases, or improving the overall efficiency of QA processes, LLMs transform the way software teams operate. But not all LLMs are created equal.
As the demand for AI-driven solutions continues to rise, it’s crucial for organizations to have options—especially when it comes to data privacy, quality of output, and scalability.
A large language model is a type of AI system that can understand and generate human-like output based on vast amounts of training data.
With great power comes great responsibility. As LLMs become more integral to automation processes, the need for secure and reliable deployment methods has become more apparent.
LLMs have made significant strides in recent years, powering AI-driven tools across various industries. In software development and QA, teams leverage these models to:
From generating test cases based on natural language prompts to generating code fixes for potential issues, LLMs are revolutionizing how teams approach both testing and development.
Many LLM-based tools available today are cloud-based. They offer convenience and scalability.
However, for organizations that handle sensitive data—whether it’s proprietary algorithms, client information, or business-critical environments—cloud-based LLMs can introduce privacy risks.
Using a cloud-hosted LLM means that sensitive data must be transferred to a third-party provider for processing. This raises concerns around the following.
For organizations that prioritize data privacy, security, and compliance, locally deployed LLMs offer a powerful alternative to cloud-based models. By deploying LLMs on-premises, businesses can reap the benefits of AI-driven optimizations without exposing sensitive data.
With an on-prem LLM, your model is housed within your organization’s own infrastructure. This eliminates the need to send any information to a third party, which reduces the risk of data breaches or exposure.
On-prem LLMs allow organizations to maintain complete control over who accesses their data and how it’s processed. This means they can implement custom security protocols, audit trails, and monitor systems tailored to their specific needs.
If a breach does occur, they can detect and address it immediately. That’s not always possible with cloud-based solutions.
If your team is thinking about choosing an LLM provider, here’s what to consider.
When selecting an LLM provider for software development and testing, it’s important to recognize that different models perform better in different areas of coding and development tasks.
Some LLMs may excel at generating code snippets, debugging, or refactoring. Others might be better at understanding complex system architectures or specific programming languages.
The ability to integrate seamlessly into development and testing environments, provide accurate and context-aware code suggestions, and handle technical documentation also varies between providers. Additionally, response speed, scalability, and how well the LLM can handle large codebases are critical factors to consider.
Choosing the right LLM provider involves evaluating how well their model aligns with your development workflow, coding languages, testing practice, and technical needs to maximize productivity and performance across your software development life cycle.
The quality of large language models differs significantly among providers due to:
Providers with access to extensive, diverse, and high-quality datasets can produce models that better understand and generate human-like outputs. Those that use more limited or biased datasets may yield models with reduced accuracy or reliability.
Model architecture also influences quality. Some LLMs are optimized for specific tasks or efficiency, while others are designed to maximize performance across a broad range of use cases.
Furthermore, how providers fine-tune and update their models impacts their ability to handle nuanced requests, maintain consistency, and adapt to evolving data trends. These differences affect the models’ output quality in areas like the following:
If you still decide to use cloud-based offerings, cost is an important factor. Cloud-based LLM providers often have varying pricing models. Factors like the size of the model and the quality of its performance capabilities influence costs.
Some providers may charge by input and output tokens for textual content, by the number of images generated, or per second of generated audio content.
Others might offer tiered plans or custom pricing for enterprise use.
By allowing teams the flexibility to select which LLM provider to integrate with their development practice or testing suite, organizations gain more control over the costs. This flexibility lets teams choose an LLM that fits their budget. It enables them to optimize spending for different projects or testing scenarios.
Ultimately, this control over provider selection ensures cost efficiency while still leveraging the full potential of AI-enhanced testing.
LLMs deployed on-prem provide a private, cost controlled, efficient, and scalable solution for organizations looking to leverage AI in their software development and test practices.
When companies have options for integrating LLM providers into their SDLC process, their teams gain the following benefits:
Here are some final takeaways.
Fine-tune software quality with AI. Integrate LLMs into your testing workflows.